My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-22-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
04-22-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:14:10 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:24:27 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
297
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#02-2762 Timothy and Mary Sweezo <br />4480 Watertown Road <br />Paee 3 of 3 _________________ <br />Tlx* T>roperty has been used as hobby farm for many years. Currently, the property has 2 <br />V 1 several chickens. At such time the property is no lon^r used as a hobby farm <br />- ' < ' all cease and the property shall be in conformance with the provisions of the <br />linance. The existing use is legal non-conforming since the property is not <br />largv >.« gh to harbor animals. <br />9.Allowing the house to be located as proposed in the plan would not change the character <br />of the property or locality. A mature wooded area is located between the house and <br />County Road 6. Moving the house to the center of the property would expose the house <br />to County Road 6. <br />It was the minority position of the Planning Commission to consider alternatives to the plan. <br />Several members of the Planning Commission commented there is concern with the prec^ent <br />that may be set by approving variances to permit the accessory buildings to remain on the <br />property. The location of the house was also discussed and several members agreed that all <br />possible opportunities for locating the house within required setbacks may not have been <br />considered since there is a suitable building envelope on the property. <br />The Planning Commission did note this is new construction and current zoning requirements <br />should be fully considered when reviewing this application. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends approval of the application based on the same findings and recommendations <br />made by the Planning Commission. <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.