Laserfiche WebLink
APR 0 6 2002 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE; March 28. 2002 <br />Cl I» or unUNU ITEM NO.: ^ <br />Department Approval: <br />Name Paul Weinberger <br />Title Zoning Administrator <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description:#2461 William and Thelma Bryson <br />James A. R. Johnson <br />650-660-670-680 Big Island <br />Zoning District:Big Island - Recreational Seasonal District <br />List of Exhibits <br />A <br />B <br />C <br />D <br />E <br />F <br />G <br />Resolution <br />Big Island Map <br />Plat Map/Existing Property Layout <br />New Property Layout <br />Draft Drainage and Utility Easement Document <br />Planning Commission Minutes (March 15. 1999) <br />City Council Minutes (April 12. 1999) <br />Application Review <br />The property owners have requested a lot line rearrangement to permit four existing residential lots on Big <br />Island, with a total of 2 cabins, to be combined to create two residential lots. This application was last <br />reviewed by the City Council on June 12. 1999. The application was tabled at that time due to an issue <br />relating to the location of one of the cabins only 1.5' from the new proposed property line. At issue was the <br />State of M innesota Building Code requirement that buildings with openings (such as window s and doorvv a> s) <br />can not be located closer than 3' to a property line. Further, all walls exposed to the property line are also <br />required to be fire resistant. The purpose is to eliminate the potential for fires from spreading from one <br />property to another. <br />The property owners had suggested they enter into an agreement with the City of Orono that they would <br />agree to remove the cabin w ithin 30 months from the approval of the lot line rearrangement. The City chose <br />not to enter into the agreement because of the difficultly the City may have with requiring the cabin to be <br />removed if it were still on the property after the 30 month time period expires. Rather than entering into an <br />agreement the City and applicant had placed the approval on hold until some time after the cabin was <br />removed. <br />The property owners have notified the City that the cabin has recently been removed and they wish to <br />complete the lot line rearrangement.