My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-25-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
03-25-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:13:46 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:22:49 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
289
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Tuesday, Febnuuy 19,2002 <br />0:30 •*dock p.m. <br />Peterson inquired whether die sewer line could be relocated back to where it was supposed to be. <br />Weinberger stated the sewer line could probably be relocated, noting that it was placed in its present <br />location because the previous property owners had requested it be relocated. Weinberger stated if the <br />adjoining property owner agrees to give an easement, the sewer line could be relocated. Weinberger <br />stated currently the City does not have an easement for the sewer line in the neighboring property. <br />Hawn inquired udiether the Applicant would like to have this application tabled or proceed forward to <br />the City Council. <br />Peterson stated they would like to move ahead. <br />Hawn commented it is likely the City Council would send it back to the Planning Commission since <br />there are a number of unresolved issues. <br />Peterson stated in terms of the drainage to the street, there is a draiiuge and utility easement that would <br />handle the runoff from the street, with a ditch carrying water from the north side of the road across into <br />the wetlands. Peterson stated they could construct a swale or ditch on their side of the road, which <br />should address all of the drainage concerns. <br />Peterson stated if the garage is relocated closer to the house, it will impact the front yard Mtback. <br />Rahn stated he personally would like the garage to be closer to the front yard setback than where it is <br />presently proposed. <br />It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that they would rather see the garage closer to the <br />front yard setback than in its present location. <br />Hawn commented it appears to be the recommendation of the Planning Cotiunission that this item be <br />tabled, with the idea that the Applicant look at revising his plans somewhat to relocate the garage out of <br />the wetland area, depict access on the plan and the actual layout of the driveway. Hawn stated by that <br />time the City should have the comments of the City Engineer concerning drainage and the Public Works <br />Director on the access issue. <br />Hawn stated the Plaiming Commission would like to see the garage relocated further away from the <br />Type 3 wetland. <br />Rahn suted he would be more receptive to granting a front yard setback than a wetland variance. Other <br />Planning Commission members agreed. <br />Peterson requested his application be tabled. <br />Hawn moved. Smith seconded, to table Application I102-274S, Ilona and Kenneth Peterson, <br />1074 Wildburst Trail, to allow the Applicant time to revise his plans. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />PAGE 13
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.