My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-25-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
03-25-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:13:46 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:22:49 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
289
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD OCTOBER 1?, 1992 <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Go«tten announced the dedication of the Kelley Parkway on October <br />14th has been postponed because of the untimely death of Mary <br />Kelley. <br />(93) JOHNSON, <br />1045 LINDEN LANE - <br />VARIANCES - RESOLUTION 93186 <br />Mr. and Mrs. Terry Johnson wore present. <br />Gaffron explained the applicants originally submitted their <br />proposal over a year ago. Since then, there have been many changes <br />to the proposal. The applicants propose the removal of an existing <br />detached garage to be replaced by an attached garage and a <br />driveway. They also propose a new deck and a second story addition <br />over the existing residence. This proposal results In the following <br />hardcover percentages: O-TS’ reduction from 8.9X to 7.2%; 75-250’ <br />Increase from 22.1% to 40.5%; and a reduction In the 250-500’ zone. <br />He clarified that the applicants Intend to keep the wall and <br />sidewalk system on the northwest corner of the house, but noted <br />that It Is built with wooden cribbing containing non-compacted <br />gravel, that only the cribbing Is considered hardcover, and the <br />square footage of existing walkway hardcover is equivalent to the <br />amount reported for replacement. <br />Mr. Johnson stated they need to keep this system for drainage <br />purposes. <br />Gaffron reported the Planning CommIsslon’s.main concern was the <br />steep lot and the amount of run-off funneled toward the lake. He <br />stated the City Engineer had reviewed the property that day. <br />Cook recommended the City condition approval on the applicants <br />maintaining the drainageway in a manner that prevents erosion. <br />Goetten asked If Cook felt the new proposal helps the drainage <br />situation. <br />Cook noted the renovation will channelize the drainage and will <br />increase the velocity of that run-off. <br />Goetten asked who Is responsible If the improvements on the <br />property aggravate the drainage problem In the area. <br />Cook stated the City should make it known It is the responsibility <br />of the property owner to correct any future drainage problems.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.