Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />Other hardcover removals include reducing the size ofthe lakeside deck, removal of a shed <br />located near the street, an open porch on the streetside of the house would be removed for <br />the garage addition, and a sidewalk and wood planter box would be removed from the west <br />side of the property. <br />Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B). To permit a 9.7' side setback for the residential addition <br />located at the northeast comer of the new house. <br />The property lines are slightly narrower by the street than at the lakeshore. This situation <br />caused the corner of the house to encroach into the required setback. It was not until after <br />the house was designed and drawn on the survey that the encroachment was discovered. <br />Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C). The proposed lot coverage by structure is 2,612 s.f. <br />(15.6%). The Zoning Code permits up to 15% of the lot area to be used for structure on the <br />property. The total lot area is 16,750 s.f., which allows a total of 2,513 s.f. (15%) of lot <br />coverage by structure on the property. <br />Lot coverage by structure ordinances were adopted to preserve space between buildings and <br />regulate the massing of structures. Additional structure also contributes towards additional <br />hardcover which can negatively impact water quality by not allowing storm water to run <br />across natural ground surjace. The concept is to allow storm water to be slowed and to <br />infiltrate into the ground. <br />Staff had requested Gronberg and Associates, surveyor/engineer, to reveriff their final <br />calculations to determine the actual size of the proposed house. The total structure was <br />confirmed to be 2.612 s.f which is 99 s.f more structure than the property is allowed <br />Statement of Hardship <br />Applicant has included a hardship statement that is included as part of Exhibit A. To summarize the <br />hardship the property owners state they are expanding the house to be comparable to other houses <br />in the neighborhood, and they arc adding to the existing house closer to lake rather than towards the <br />street to protect an 80 year old oak tree. <br />Site Drainage <br />Staff received the final site grading and drainage plans on February 14* and have not had an <br />opportunity to complete review as of the date of this memo. Any recommendation of approval shall <br />require additional City Staff review of the plans prior to any Council action. <br />«02-27S3 Wesley Byroe <br />2817 Cisco Point Road <br />Febniiry 19.2002 <br />Page 2 of 4