My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-11-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
03-11-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 9:24:12 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:22:34 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8. <br />The location of the fire station is relatively fixed based on the need for parking <br />lot access and parking stalls on the north end of the building, minimum <br />setback requirements, and the required length of the building to serve the <br />needs ofthe fire department. Moving the building an additional 10'northward <br />to avoid the variance would have resulted in re-design of the site plan and the <br />building. <br />The planned construction of a temporary bridge over the new Highway 12 <br />corridor which will impact a significant portion ofthe northwest comer of the <br />site, makes it impossible to shift the building to the north. Also, a stand of <br />mature coniferous trees would be destroyed if the building was moved to the <br />north. <br />The basis for a 50' side street setback requirement for institutional/municipal <br />buildings is to minimize the impact on the surrounding neighborhood. The <br />fire station will be situated 100 feet from the south lot line of the property, and <br />the road will be moved further off the lot line to avoid impacting the linear <br />wetlands. Both factors tend to minimize impact of the variance on the only <br />directly affected neighboring property, the Mi Her residence to the south. That <br />residence is located approximately 100 ’ from its north lot line, or about 200' <br />from the fire station building. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property and in relation <br />to Lot 1 are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning <br />district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, <br />air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable <br />hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserv'e a substantial property right of the <br />applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and <br />Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by <br />the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the community. <br />Page 4 of 7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.