Laserfiche WebLink
2. The residence was built prior to current zoning standards. <br />3. The new proposal does reduce the lot coverage by structures still well below the allowed <br />15%. <br />4. Hardcover in the 0-75* setback zone will decrease from the previous approval. <br />5. The screen porch and additional decking does increase the amount of structure towards the <br />lake rather than on the side of the residence as previously approved. <br />6. Other issues raised by the Planning Conunission. <br />Options for Action: <br />1. Recommend approval of variances. <br />2. Reconunend denial of variances, stating reasons. <br />3. Table, giving q;>plicant direction. <br />4. Other action. <br />#01-2706 Richard and Jane Stark <br />SIS Paitenwood <br />Variance Changes <br />page 3 of 3