Laserfiche WebLink
4. <br />5. <br />2. <br />j. <br />Hie configuration of the lot severely restricts the allowable building pad. <br />■" '“k'sl'ore setback would bereduced from 20% to 15.3%. <br />conditions e.'dsting on this propert>' are peculiar <br />to It and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district- that <br />^tmg the vanances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />serve as'^a neighboring property; would not merelv <br />serve ^ a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate 'a <br />toTe^^rieL onh^ °r Pr«er^e a substantial <br />fntent^f rht the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the Zomng Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />r,rr ?'couunisslon. reports by cfty starcricntr <br />and welfare'nf'th ''''' Ptoposed variance on the health, safetvand welfare of the community. <br />CONCLUSIOsNS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS <br />Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono Cit\- Council herebv <br />grants yanances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 aAd to allow th- <br />remodeling and e.xpansion of the existing residence located 34‘ from the OHWT where 75 ’ is <br />required and hardcover of 4,415 s.f (15.3%) in the O' to 75 ’ lakeshore setback where 5 815 s f <br />(20%) is e.xistmg and none is allowed. ’ <br />All plastic under landscaping must be removed in the 0’ to 75 ’ lakeshore setback <br />prior to any new construction. <br />No further variances will be granted to this property in the fubarc. <br />but^are* n!,S“ applicants, <br />nermit ^ e.\ercised by application for a building <br />exTj an ‘if ^'c**^^*expire on that date (October 25, 2000). <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />Page 2 of5