02-11-2002 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING ____ October 23,2000 •(ni) M620 PAUL PUSCUZZI, 3320 NAVARRE LANE - AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 4548 Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLlTnONTiO. 4548, a Resolution approving a variance to allow placement of an accMSOf^tructure between the principal building and the front lot line where no accessojy'lfructures are normally allowed and 15 feet from the front lot line where 30Jeefis required for the property located at 3320 Navarre Lane. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays *(«2) «621 JAMES BARTJI<3725 TOGO ROAD - PRELIMINARY PLAT - RESOLUTION NO. 454) Flint movedj^aifsevere seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4549, a Resoluwipn^proving preliminary plat subject to the conditions outlined in the Resolution. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. •(#13) #2624 ROGER OLSEN, 815 PARTENWOOD RO.^D - RENEWAL VARIANCES RESOLUTION NO. 4550 Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4550, a Resolution granting renewal of variances to allow the remodeling and expansion of the existing residence to include a four stall garage and additional living space for property located at 815 Partenwood Road, subject to the conditions outlined in the resolution. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. (#14^Ai;^L^L\RTHORKELSON, 440 BIG ISLAND, AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE Mrs. Willmar Tho(i«lson and John Waldron, Atiomey-at-Law, were present. Bottenberg stated the Ap^hc^ts have requested an after-the-fact variance to permit a 12’ by 24’ storage shed to retraio^ this propertv" located on Big Island. The shed is currently located 23 feet firom a platted, dedicated right-of-way where 30 feet is required. The Planning Commission voted 3 to 3 on ambUQn to recommend denial of the variance to permit the storage shed to remain on the property/^v^ the opinion of the Planning Commission members favoring denial that permitting the storage shed-tqremain would set a negative precedent. :d f^Uje plan size of the shed be decreased or moved to meet the required setb^>^ The Planning Commission members would not have voted as is, but would favor the It was the opinion of the Planning Commission members favoring variance approval that permitting the storage shed to remain was acceptable because only a small portion of the smrag^hed was in the setback. The platted, dedicated right-of-way is not and is not intended to be dev^pe^street within Big Island and because the building is in the most appropriate location on the lot b the topography. PAGE?