My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-14-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
01-14-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 9:15:36 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:14:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
measure spring hydrology. Additional wells will be placed in an existing wetland near the created <br />wetland so that comparisons of hydrology between the two locations are possible. This is a critical task <br />of monitoring, as the hydrology of wetlands can be difficult to document with only casual field <br />observations. Monthly monitoring will commence with the installation of the monitoring wells, and <br />continue during the growing season (May - September) for five years. If permanent inundation is <br />expected to be present, a staff gauge may also be used to document hydrology in the mitigation area. <br />In addition to water level monitoring, quantitative analysis of vegetation and hydric soils will be <br />completed annually. This analysis will provide the necessary information to determine the success of the <br />wetland mitigation and if any grading adjustments, reseeding, or spot improvements need to made to <br />improve the success of the site. This information will be included in an annual report and submitted to <br />the appropriate agency. <br />The determination of success of the mitigation site w ill be coordinated through agency correspondence <br />and by implementing any recommended corrective actions. In the fifth year of monitoring, a final <br />wetland delineation will be completed at the mitigation site. Results of this delineation will be submitted <br />with a final annual report with a request that the mitigation site be considered successful and that <br />monitoring is no longer required. If the success of the mitigation site can be conclusively shown prior to <br />the fifth year, it is allowable to ask for early termination of the monitoring requirement. Early <br />termination is usually reserved for small or less complex sites and requires approval from the appropriate <br />regulatory agency. <br />Task 4 - Monitoring reports <br />Annual monitoring reports will be completed and submitted to the reviewing agencies. The annual report <br />will include such information as project description, as-built specifications (first report only), <br />comparison of mitigation site to existing wetlands, summary of current year ’s data, site photographs, and <br />the results of the successional analysis. <br />Costs <br />Budgets are developed for the life of the monitoring project. Increases in labor rates are built into each <br />year. Monitoring wells are not a billable expense item. Reimbursable expenses are restricted to mileage, <br />photographs, and report productions. <br />The costs provided do not reflect time requested by regulatory agencies for field review or development <br />of possible remediation plans. These costs are unpredictable and project specific. Costs for developing <br />remediation measures will be provided upon request. <br />Year 1 <br />Construction Observation Hours Cost <br />Project Scientist (four site visits)13 910 <br />Comparison of as-built to plan and well installation 4 280 <br />Technical Memorandum (as necessary)2 140 <br />Word Processing (as necessary)1 32 <br />Senior Scientist Project Coordination and Review 1 100 <br />Photographs 30 <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.