My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-25-2002 Council Work Session
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
03-25-2002 Council Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 9:08:57 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:08:39 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IF "NO," ASK: <br />34. What additional parks and recreational facilities would <br />you like to see offered residents? <br />35 Do you feel the City of Orono SHOULD DE^hOP. . . . .26% <br />should develop a mo« extensive ARE ADEQUATE.^...... .66% <br />park system or do you feel that DON'T KNOW/REFOSED. . .8% <br />current facilities are adequate <br />for city residents? <br />The City could undertake a number of park and recreational devel <br />opment efforts. <br />36. Which of the following would you PRIORI^ A. . . . . . . .42% <br />make the chief priority of the .. . . . . . .City of Orono .... {ROTATE) PRIORITY C.. . ...... ■ • • 2 ” <br />A. Preserving more natural land "is.areas, suSh as wetlands, see- M-I, OP ABOTO (VOL).... 1S% <br />SiSiflts,*'’“**' <br />B. Developing additional active <br />park facilities, such as ball <br />fields and playgrounds; <br />C. Developing additional passive <br />park facilities, such as walk <br />ing trails and flower gardens. <br />The oreservation of open space or the development of ^ <br />facilities by the City of Orono would probably <br />a property t« increase. Lppose the City were to pro- <br />ooM^parks'^and recreational development efforts along the lines <br />^0 have been discussing.••• <br />37. HOW much would you be willing to N^ING. . . . . .!! " <br />see your yearly property taxes $30.0 . . . . .... . . <br />increase to fund the parks and $60.00. . . . . .. <br />recreational development efforts? $90.00.. . . . . . . . . . <br />Let^s say, would you be willing to $120.00. . . . . . . . . .. <br />vour yearly tLces increased by $150.00. . . . . . . . . . <br />i ? (CHOOSE^RANDOM STARTING $180.00.... . . . . . .*5 <br />POINT; MOVE UP OR DOWN DEPENDING . . . .! ! ! ! ! .3% <br />ON ANSWER) How about $_ _ per .. . . . . . . . . . <br />year? (REPEAT PROCESS) <br />1,4 uve to read you a list of park and recreation <br />soSe“It SS^poSrJtn^Shat eppos^. or strongly oppose a moderate
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.