Laserfiche WebLink
Date Application Received: 10-21-03 <br />Date Application ConiIdered at Complete: 10-21 -03 <br />60-Day Review Period Eipires: 12-20-03 <br />COllNr;il MPPTiMr; <br />DEC 6 20U5 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />CITY OH OHu.'^O <br />CONSENT AGENDA Date: December 4,2003 <br />Item No.: 7 <br />Department Approval: <br />Name: Michael P. GafTron <br />Title: Planning Director ’Ml <br />Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: <br />Zonir.2 <br />Item Description: i^03*2866a Judy & David Zoschke, 2040 Shadywood Road <br />- Appeal of Administrative Decision - Motion to Confirm <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Notice of Council Action 12-1-03 <br />B - Depiction of Agreed-upon Removals <br />C - Memo and Selected Exhibits of 11-14-03 <br />Application Summary: Applicant is appealing City Staff s interpretation of the conclusions of the <br />Planning Commission and Council in relation to the extent of hardco\ er removals required per <br />Resolution No. 4920, adopted February 24,2003. <br />Planning Commission Findings and Conclusions: Planning Commission reviewed this on <br />November 17,2003. On a vote of 4-0, Planning Commissioners who were at the February PC hearing <br />concluded that the drawing in Exhibit A of Resolution No. 4920 correctly depicts the Planning <br />Commission’s intent regarding removals of concrete patio. However, the number "681 s.f." was not <br />part of their conclusion, therefore staff should calculate the actual square footage based on the <br />drawing, and that result should be used as the basis for removals. Further, applicant has the option <br />of removing other items of hardcover in the 0-75' zone than concrete patio to make up the required <br />square footage (except for rock/plastic landscaping bed liner which was to be removed regardless). <br />Staff Recommendation: Staff concurs with the conclusion of the Planning Commission. <br />This item was tabled at your November 24 meeting because the applicant was not present. Staff met <br />with Mr. Zoschke on the site on November 21 and discussed the additional removals required to <br />comply with the Planning Commission’s conclusion (see 11-14 memo). <br />Staff has recalculated the total area of the required removals at 644 s.f. rather than the 681 s.f noted <br />in the Resolution. Mr. Zoschke has advised staff he agrees to remove the additional hardcover items <br />necessary to meet this requirement, w hich includes the upper patio and the concrete sw ale across the <br />sidewalk from the waterway. Given that the applicant has accepted the conclusion of the Planning <br />Commission, the only remaining action necessary is for Council to confirm the findings of the <br />Plaiming Commission. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Motion to confirm the conclusion of the Planning Commission. PROPOSED MOTION: Moved <br />by __, seconded by __, that in the appeal by Judy and David Zoschke. File ~03-2866a, the City <br />Council hereby confirms the findings and conclusions of the Planning Commission as noted in the <br />staff memo to Council dated December 4,2(X)3.