Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, NOVEMBER 24,2003 <br />3. #02-2829 OroHO Zoning Code Amendment—Section 78-7!—RegulathH of <br />Nonconforming Uses and Nonconforming Structures—Continued <br />Murphy asked about the overall basic goal of the ordinance changes. Gaflron stated that <br />Orono’s code never had a threshold for how far one could go on a remodel before it <br />triggered the need to come into conformance. The proposed ordinance will limit <br />expansions and require properties be brought into conformity if too much is tom down. <br />Murphy stated his only concern was whether the attorney should review it before Council <br />voted. <br />Barrett asked if there was any need to rush on the ordinance. Gaffron stated there was not. <br />McMillan asked if there was a volume distinction for involuntary destruction. Gaffron <br />stated there was not. This part of the code always contained a “75% of fair market value” <br />distinction. Staff felt with voluntary destruction, volume would be fairly easily addressed. <br />McMillan asked if in the past, on a teardown where the foundation was left, would they <br />have allowed someone to lebuild in a nonconforming situation. Gaffton stated that if the <br />foundation was too close to the lotline or lake, they would need a variance to put back <br />anything that was nonconforming. <br />McMillan stated her concern was that some people might not be able to get the same value <br />of house as they already had by bringing the property into conformance on a substandard <br />lot. <br />Gaffron stated that the logical situation would be to look at a variance for such a property. <br />The intent of the code was not to make substandard lots with substandard houses currently <br />in existence unbuildable, but to give clear direction that if the ability exists to make a <br />property conforming, then it is expected. Variances would continue to be granted where <br />there is clearly a hardship. <br />Murphy moved, and White seconded, to table Item 3, Orono Zoning Code <br />Amendment—Section 78-71—Regulation of Nonconforming Uses and <br />Nonconforming Structures, for legal review. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />4. 803-2866A David and Judy 2^chke, 2040 Sbad>'wood Road—Administrative <br />Appeal <br />The applicants were not present.