Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT D <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEET ING <br />Monday, October 27,2003 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />7. M3-2929 JEFF MARTHSEAU, 2565 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - CONDITIONAL <br />USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 5064, Continued <br />standard code restrictions on use of that structure, and concurrent removals of eicess <br />hardcover per the Planning Commission recommendation. <br />As a follow-up to the neighbor’s request, Murphy confirmed with and thanked the <br />applicant for his willingness to postpone construction until after Mr. Callahan has moved. <br />Mr. Martineau obliged the request. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />SsOLUTIo1^NO^5065 ROAD, VARIANCE - <br />Murphy moved. White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5065, a Resolution <br />approving the lot area and lot width variances, side street setback variances per the <br />Planning Commission recommendation, and approval of the 75-250’ hardcover at <br />1,838 s.f. in order to construct a new residence on the property located at 3445 <br />Crystal Bay Road.VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />- RESO l It IoIT nO ^ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />Murphy moved, >Vhlte seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5066, a Resolution <br />granting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a barn on a ’through’ lot located at <br />465 Turnham Road, subject to its proposed location on the submitted plans VOTE* <br />Ayes 4, Nays 0. ^ <br />^ 10. ROBERT AND JANET LAB ALT, 3202 NORTH S’iORE DRIVE - VARIANCE <br />Waataja reported that thw applicants have requested the following variances to construct an <br />addition, approximately 515 s.f., to the existing home. <br />1. Hardcover variance for the 75-250* zone to allow 37.6% hardcover when 25% is <br />normally allowed and 50.5% currently exists. <br />2. Hardcover variance for the 250-500’ zoi.. to allow 42.7% hardcover when 30% is <br />normally allow ed and 55% currently exists. <br />3. Side yard setback variance to allow a setback of 2.8 feet when 10’ is required and 2 8’ <br />currently exists. <br />4. Structural coverage variance to allow 19.4% when 15% is required. <br />While the applicant had met with staff to discuss other options. Waataja indicated that it <br />was their preference to move for%vard with their original plan, which the Planning <br />PACE 6 of 16