My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
11-24-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 8:45:54 AM
Creation date
2/8/2023 3:12:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
458
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
► <br />5. <br />6. <br />minimum required lot area. The property consists of approximately 0.4 acres. <br />3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on Februaiy 19, 2003 <br />and recommended approval by a vote of 6 to 0. <br />4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br />A. The deck has existed for many years in the location of the proposed deck; <br />B. Replacement of the deck as it currently exists and enclosing a small area will not <br />increase the lot coverage by structure, hardcover in the 75 ’-250 ’ hardcover zone <br />or change the average lakeshore setback; <br />C. The deck will continue to provide a landing for nvo sliding glass doors located on <br />the lakeside of the house; <br />D. The neighbors’ views of the lake are not greatly affected by the location of the <br />deck or the proposed patio enclosure; <br />E. There exists 1,506 s.f. of non-conforming plastic hardcover on the property that <br />must be removed; and <br />F. Excessive existing hardcover in the 0-75 ’ zone can be substantially reduced by <br />removing a portion of the concrete patio near the lake. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it <br />and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district: that granting the <br />variances will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard <br />or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to <br />the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty’; is <br />necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants: and would be in <br />keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the <br />City. <br />The City Council has considered this application, including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by <br />the applicants and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the community. <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />1I <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.