My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
11-24-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 8:45:54 AM
Creation date
2/8/2023 3:12:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
458
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
V <br />f Date Application Received: 10-21-03 <br />Date Application Considered as Coropiete: I0*2I*03 <br />60-Day Review Period Eipires: 12-20^3 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />COUNCII <br />NOV 5 <br />CITY Oh UhiuivO <br />Date: November 19,2003 <br />Item No.: <br />Department Approval: <br />Name: Michael P. Gaflron <br />Title: Planning Director <br />Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: i^03-2866a Judy & David Zoschke, 2040 Shadywood Road <br />- Appeal of Administrative Decision - Motion to Confirm <br />List of Exhibits <br />A • Notice of Planning Commission Action 11-19-03 <br />B-Staff Sketch <br />C - Memo and Exhibits of 11-14-03 <br />Application Summary: Applicant is appealing City Staff s interpretation ofthe conclusions ofthe <br />Planning Commission and Council in relation to the extent of hardcover removals required per <br />Resolution No. 4920, adopted February 24,2003. <br />Planning Commission Findings and Conclusions: Planning Commission reviewed this on <br />November 17, 2003. On a vote of 4-0, Planning Commissioners who were at the Febmary PC <br />hearing concluded that the drawing in Exhibit A of Resolution No. 4920 correctly depicts the <br />Planning Commission ’s intent regarding removals of concrete patio. However, the number “681 <br />s.f." was not part of their conclusion, therefore staff should calculate the actual square footage <br />based on the drawing, and that result should be used as the basis for removals. Further, applicant <br />has the option of removing other items of hardcover in the 0-75' zone than concrete patio to make <br />up the required square footage (except for rock/plastic landscaping bed liner which was to be <br />removed regardless). <br />Staff Recommendation: Staff concurs with the conclusion of the Planning Commission. <br />Staff has recalculated the area of the concrete patio to be removed as depicted in Exhibit A, and finds <br />a total square footage of644 s.f. rather than 681 s.f as noted in the Resolution. Staff is scheduled <br />to meet with the property owners on 1 1-21-03 to consider which additional 0-75' hardcover items <br />should be removed to meet the 6-14 s.f requirement. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Motion to confirm the conclusion of the Planning Commission. <br />PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by__, seconded by__, that in the appeal by Judy and David <br />Zoschke, File #03-2866a, the City Council hereby confirms the findings and conclusions of the <br />Planning Commission as noted in the staff memo to Council dated November 19,2003. <br />I- <br />9 <br />I <br />dlRl
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.