My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
11-24-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 8:45:54 AM
Creation date
2/8/2023 3:12:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
458
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
This standard requires al-ost half of the wdih of the Newkirk's 132 ft wide lot to be <br />dSteft hJ M «“'« = hardship, especially in an area orismct where no lot is two acres in area and only one lot is over 200 ft in width. Strict <br />application of the assumed character of development in the LR-IA district, and the two acre <br />0^^^^ fc'tv"-T ^ 'M' !-“<* 0" <Ws a* of Shoreline eliminates theopiwmnity for typical or anticipaied dev elopment of this lake front site. This standard makes <br />OT^S si-de“of Sh" T character are the same, but noton this side of Shoreline, where they signincantly differ. The Newkirk’s condition cannot be <br />overcome or addressed by purchasi.-.g additional lot width from our neichbors. <br />width cannot be purchasirf from the neighbors as their lots are also non conforming due to arearpe“„nird^rs;"''' - <br />Both neighboring homeowners have rev iewed the building plan and the request for variances <br />md hav e no objection to their being granted. The existing plantings and landscapine between the <br />nlSedt^r bewv eenuie homes well in excels of that.. .. • / ‘. ....... uci^vccn me nomcs we m c.xcess of that <br />provided by mer^y distmce. GrantL-.g the variance would simply maintain the estab&hed fte <br />lo/. hardcover standard is met by t.-.e proposed new home that is the subject of the requested <br />the home on the souU. pro; ides a trai-^ition and buffer betweeTe rol“e°x"e«: ^f^^' <br />provided by merely distwce. The v isual space between the closest comers of the 0^x 0^ <br />places the most passive uses, the garage, closets and master bath, on the south side 0 X to™ <br />where greatest area of new side yard intrusion, 736 sf vs 45 1 sf. is located ^ ’ <br />Absent the requested variances to permit rebuildine the home the 0 m 7C fi -n <br />nm to reduced by 51, sf and 10053. and the 75 to 250 ft Im be3;;”loT; <br />3. Impervious Surface, 75 to 250 ft. <br />As you toovv by now we don't ti-.ink the site can be enlarged to create additional imoervious <br />surface to ofisel or provide a greater reduction in the necessary tvoical and an. Wn.,T^ <br />unpervious surface associated vvidi a home on a site like this, n; addition, the preren^h"e7“” <br />^veway OTangeraent, that cannot be practically altered due to the engineering stand^dTof <br />surftce’’«mp7mrour rite 7^74"! e!7m^^ <br />Granting the variance will allow construction of a new plan which will reduce the 0 to 75 <br />impervious surface from ol9 sf to 0 s: and the 75 to 250 ft impervious surface from,24rs7to
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.