Laserfiche WebLink
Wrx: <br />*- <br />.V-* <br />- <br />• :. .V <br />V'. ^ Vi^ <br />. •’) <br />•'.'i.i. <br />’..V;;.V:-w5‘ <br />-• ■ ■•• lt.4. • <br />■ :i*p\'. <br />sif <br />■M« <br />I • • < <br />■■ <br />fe;*' <br />• V'»> <br />• ^ ''.’ri.C <br />■i'l',.; fiS <br />ORONO REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 13, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1568-PIERPONT CONTINUED <br />Callahan noted that Mabusth’s rerc states that th« tuest <br />house/stable structure would have to be removed tf Let 14 is not <br />combined with Lot 15. Ke said, -In light cf infcrr.aticn we <br />received pertaining to another applicaticr. this evening, 1 do not <br />believe we can require removal of the structure.- <br />Barrett said, “The City could grant a per-it based on the <br />existence of certain health and safety structures, such as access <br />to the septic system.- <br />Callahan agreed that Barrett’s ccr: e-ts wculc held true for <br />now. He said. -If in the future, the errperty owners wish to <br />subdivide and sell Lot 14, the structure we are discussing this <br />evening should be removed.** <br />Bellows said, **If the property cwners request a subdivision <br />of the property, the guest house structure and septic needs would <br />be addressed under tne subdivision regula cions. ** <br />Bernhardson suggested tabling this -atter t: allow time for <br />staff to explore available options. <br />Mayor Graces as<ed Mrs. Pierccnc if tabling this matter for <br />two weeks would pose any problems. <br />Mrs. Pierpont replied, -There is a timing emblem.. *«’e wish <br />to complete the guest house so that we ray reside in it wr.ile we <br />have a ccntractcr read to start onremodel our house. <br />Monday.- <br />Bellows asked whether staff has explcred the option of <br />locating an additional septic site cn Lc* 15. <br />Gaffron stated that staff has net Iccked at tnat eptien, but <br />based on topography, would probably be difficult. <br />.Mayor Grabek asked whether there are any ether unresolved <br />issues involved witr. this application. <br />Mabusth replied, -There are none. In fact staff has <br />deter.mined that footings do in fact exist under the stable. <br />Prior to the Planning Cemmissien raetinc. staff nad been advised <br />that the footings did not exist. T“e Flanning Commission <br />recommendation was based on that incorrect inforratiem.- <br />Mayer Grabek suggested that staff te allowed tc atte-pt to <br />resolve the lot ccmcinaticn issue withc.t the need tc br.ng the <br />matter back to Council. He said. ’’If tnere is a satisfactory <br />solution, you .may proceed witn construction. rcwever. snculd <br />difficulties arise, the matter will have tc come cac< to Council, <br />in two weeks." <br />- 13 -