My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
11-24-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 8:45:54 AM
Creation date
2/8/2023 3:12:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
458
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday. November 17,2003 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />While she would not have voted to support the current placement of the sport court if <br />they’d come before the Commission first, Hawn asked whether a time limit should be <br />placed on the courts removal or new placement. <br />Gallron stated that weather conditions may warrant a removal/relocation deadline of June <br />2004. <br />Bremer questioned whether the applicants had spoken to their contractor about their role in <br />creating this problem. <br />Gross stated that the contractor refened them to the contract. <br />Tichy, the neighbor, questioned whether Sport Court should have proceeded without a <br />permit knowing what they do about limitations within Orono. He pointed out that Sport <br />Court has acknowledged that Orono is one of 5 communities in the metro area with more <br />restrictive setback allow ances than most. He argued that Sport Court might have a bit more <br />liability in the situation than they have been leading the Gross’ to believe. <br />Craig Jones, owner of Sport Court, stated that for 18 years he has been the one to pull <br />permits for his clients; however, he had recently changed this policy and put the <br />responsibility of this upon the customer. Unfortunately, as in this situation, Jones stated <br />that he has learned this is not an effective alternative and has reversed his policy so that he, <br />the contractor, pulls the permits. Jones stated that he was familiar with Orono’s rules <br />regarding setback, having spoken to Lyle Oman in the past. . <br />Fritzler asked why the contractor didn’t question the fact no permit was posted at the site. <br />He stated that he would not be in support of granting the after-the-fact request. <br />Fritzler moved, Hawn seconded, to recommend denial of Application #03-2950, David <br />and Tara Gross, 2635 Countryside Drive, a request for an after-the-fact variance to <br />PAGE 20 of 56 <br />H <br />1 <br />1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.