My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
11-24-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 8:45:54 AM
Creation date
2/8/2023 3:12:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
458
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 17,2003 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />within the applicants property. <br />Foth pointed out that City Code Section 86^, indicates a permit is required for <br />construction of structures in excess of 1000 s.f. and are subject to additional setback <br />requirements. Had a permit been ^iplied for in this case, the ^)plicant and the contractor <br />would have been made aware of the 30’ side setback for oversized sport courts (which lore <br />treated as tennis courts). <br />Foth reported that Plaiming Staff recommends denial of the after*the>fact variance request <br />based on a finding that if there are too many restrictioos caused by other site features and <br />amenities, then these factors are not hardships but are reasons that the site carmot support <br />an additional amenity. <br />Ms. Gross indicated that the garden issues had been solved and were no longer in question. <br />Mr. Gross explained that their intent to construct a sport court in this location was by no <br />means meant to be a malicious act. He indicated that he and his family moved to Ormio <br />two years earlier and have been heaxily involved in the community. Having looked at their <br />options for constructing a sport court last spring, they settled on this location as it was <br />visible from the kitchen windows and proceeded without objection from adjoining <br />properties. Gross stated that, in fact, the adjoining neighbor had no objection at the time <br />but instead asked to use the sport court when complete. In addition, he had seen several <br />full size teiuiis courts and sports courts on property lines throughout the area and had no <br />concerns about its placement. <br />Although the intent was to build the sport court 10’ from the property line, which they fdt <br />was meeting code based on others they’d seen, due to grade changes the court was shifted <br />to merely 6’ off the property line. .Mr. Gross stated that, after construction, Bruce Vang <br />^>proached the applicants and said we’d have to apply for an after*the-fact variance. In so <br />doing, the Gross’ hired Gronberg and Associates to handle the matter and provide the City <br />PAGE 17 of 56 <br />•I <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.