Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 27,2003 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />7. #03-2929 JEFF MARTINEA V, 2565 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - CONDITIONAL <br />USE PERMIT- RESOLUTION NO. 5064, Continued <br />standard code restrictions on use of that structure, and concurrent removals of excess <br />hardcover per the Planning Commission recommendation. <br />As a follow-up to the neighbor's request, Murphy confirmed with and thanked the <br />applicant for his willingness to postpone construction until afler Mr. Callahan has moved. <br />Mr. Martineau obliged the request. <br />VOTE; Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />*8. #03-2934 JASON BLISS, 3445 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD, VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5065 <br />Murphy moved. White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5065, a Resolution <br />approving the lot area and lot width variances, side street setback variances per the <br />Planning Commission recommendation, and approval of the 75-250 ’ hardcover at <br />1,838 s.f. in order to construct a new residence on the property located at 3445 <br />Cr>'stal Bay Road.VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />*9. #03-2941 PAUL CADY, 465 TURNHAM ROAD, CONDITIONAL USE PERxMlT <br />- RESOLUTION NO. 5066 <br />Murphy moved. W hite seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5066, a Resolution <br />granting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a bam on a ’through’ lot located at <br />465 Turnham Road, subject to its proposed location on the submitted plans. VOTE: <br />Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />10. ROBERT AND JANET LABALT, 3202 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCE <br />Waataja reported that the applicants have requested the following variances to construct an <br />addition, appro.ximatcly 515 s.f., to the e.xisting home. <br />1 . Hardcover variance for the 75-250' zone to allow 37.6% hardcover when 25% is <br />normally allowed and 50.5% currently exists. <br />2. Hardcover variance for the 250-500' zone to allow 42.7% hardcover when 30% is <br />normally allow ed and 55°b currently exists. <br />3. Side yard setback variance to allow a setback of 2.8 feet when 10' is required and 2.8* <br />currently exists. <br />4. Structural coverage variance to allow 19.4% when 15% is required. <br />\Miile the applicant had met w ith staff to discuss other options, Waataja indicated that it <br />was their preference to move forward with their original plan, which the Plaiming <br />PAGE 6 of 16 <br />.r <br />J