Laserfiche WebLink
3ool ^p€cia fists anJ Sut^sons^ <br />S. SCOTT STANOA. O P.M.. F.A.C.F.S. <br />MICHAEL O O’BORSKY. D PM., F.A.C.F.S. <br />287 MAPSCHALL PD.. SUITE 106 <br />8HAKOPEC, MN 8S379 <br />TCLCPHONC: (992) 449-5990 <br />FAX: (9921 449-9994 <br />E MAIL: STAN0A0PM@A0L COM <br />290 NORTH CENTRAL AVC.. SUITE 914 <br />WAVZATA. MN 99991 <br />TELEP monc (992)476-1976 <br />F ax (992) 476-7494 <br />E-MAIL; STAN0A0PM@A0L COM <br />November 4,2002 <br />Lyle Oman, Building Official <br />City of Orono Municipal Offices <br />270 Kelly Pkwy <br />Orono. MN 55356 <br />Dear Mr. Oman: <br />This letter is just a follow up of our conversation of the 21“ of October and it also is in response to your letter of <br />October 17.2002. This letter is more to give you my understanding of the chronology of this so that we are in <br />agreement on this. My boathouse deck was replaced in April of2001. I did the work myself. Cost and materials <br />was approximately S900. I replaced the deck because it was rotting and I believed it to be a danger. The <br />dimensions to the deck were not changed when I replaced it. The deck does have a railing that meets code I <br />failed to get a permit to replace the existing deck because quite frankly I did not think I needed to get a permi* to <br />replace an existing structure that did not change the dimensions. However, because of an inspection by someone <br />r ^ ^ ^ application for a retroactive permit in <br />July of 2001. With this I sent a check, which was twice the cost because it was a retroactive permit I also <br />provided documents, sketches and photograph of the pre-existing deck. I did not hear anything about this until <br />your letter of October 17.2002. <br />So. in sum.Tiary. approximately 15 months went between my application for a retroactive permit with check <br />included and this letter that I received from you on October 17. I know you are very busy with all the construction <br />going on and that you arc overworked with all the issues under your jurisdiction. I do not have to walk very far <br />from my house to look at houses that are blotting out the sun that have been recently remodeled, so, my question <br />would be. what happened? Again, my position in this matter is that I replaced a pre-existing deck with dimensions <br />at the pie-existing dimensions and the deck was replaced because it was structurally unsound. 1 did the work <br />myself and the cost of material was $900. This has now taken 15 months to resolve for actually no change in my <br />property. I would like this resolved at the soonest possible time. <br />Sincerely, <br />S. Scott Standa, DPM <br />SSS/soap/sb <br />Mailing Address : P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal, MN. 55323 <br />n <br />i j <br />I