Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, OCTOBER 13,2003 <br />FIRE SERVICE REPORT <br />None. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />None. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT <br />*3. #03-2936 Bruce Meese & Maureen Murphy, 3135 Casco Circle—Varianc <br />Resolution No. 5058 <br />Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 5058 granting a <br />hardcover variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-282 and 78-1288(B) <br />to allow an existing lakeside deck to remain in the 0 -75’ setback zone. <br />Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />4. #03-2948 WJ.\I Properties, LLC, 2605 West Wayzata Boulevard—Conditional <br />Use Permit Extension —Resolution No. 5059 <br />Gaffron stated the item was removed from Consent Agenda to clarify wording in the <br />resolution. He stated that the applicants were asking for a 16-month extension of the CUP <br />because they had issues to work through with the Watershed District. Until all matters <br />with the Watershed District are finalized, they cannot proceed with the required conditions <br />of Resolution No. 4845, which include a screening fence, berms, and trees at the north end <br />of the parking lot. The applicant expects resolution w ith the MCWD by the end of 2004. <br />Gaflron stated that the applicant's attorney, Peter Johnson, wanted to be sure that the <br />required temporary screening described in items 3 and 4 of Findings in the Resolution <br />only apply to the IS parking stalls on the northeast end of the parking lot. <br />Murphy suggested that since the building would not progress for the next 16 months, the <br />City could ask the applicant to put a coat of paint on the face of the building. Mayor <br />Petereon, White, and Sansevere agreed that would be appropriate. Mayor Peterson stated <br />they should request the applicant paint the front of the building in good faith. <br />Mayor Peterson moved, and White seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 5059 <br />approving a 16-month extension of the effective period of Resolutions No. 4585 and <br />No. 4993 to December 31,2004, due to delays as noted in the applicant’s letter of <br />request which Is part of the public record of Application #03-2948 and hereby <br />approves an amendment to the Industrial Site Plan Approval granted via Resolution