Laserfiche WebLink
rr <br />L <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, October 20,2003 <br />6:00 o'clock pjn. <br />r <br />Gaffron indicated that the discussion had not purrjed that far, since it was the applicant's <br />intent to keep what he had. <br />Mr. Standa voluntrzred to make additional recovals of hardcover on the propert.', <br />including the concrete slab behind the accessory srjcture, sidewalk along side of the horn ; <br />to the accessory building, and repair or removal of *iie crumbling lake access steps. <br />Mabusth recommended the lake access steps be replaced for safety sake, since the lot is a <br />steep lake lot. <br />Mr. Standa pointed out that the retaining walls wculd also be in need of repair in the near <br />future. <br />Hawn questioned the necessity of the fire pit and f.agpole. <br />Mr. Standa indicated that he would prefer to keep both his flagpole and fire pit; however, if <br />it was mandated he could remove the fire pit. <br />Mabusth questioned whether the LMCD would have an issue with the structure protruding <br />over the water. <br />Gaffron stated that the LMCD may want to Ioc'jc at it if the posts are at or below the <br />OHWL. <br />If this application had come before the Commission before the fact, Mabusth asked the <br />Commission what they would have allowed. She noted that she would have asked for the <br />removal of the slab. <br />Hawn questioned whether they would have approved a deck on an accessory structure, and <br />an even bigger deck than previously attached to this nonconforming structure. She asked <br />whether it was the Commission's intent to do away with these structures altogether. Hawn <br />Page 6 of 41 <br />f