Laserfiche WebLink
FT' <br />M3-29S6 <br />October 20.2003 <br />Pigtsors <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Does the fact that the lot was created without consideration of the average lakeshore <br />setback constitute means for i^)proving the variance? <br />2. Does the back lot designation and the topography which doesn ’t obstruct others ’ view <br />of the lake provide enough valid hardship for approving the variance. <br />3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff Rcco jimendation <br />Approval of the average lakeshore setback variance to allow the proposed house to <br />encroach approximately 68 ’ into the required setback.