My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-27-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
10-27-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 8:45:21 AM
Creation date
2/8/2023 3:05:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
447
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M3-2943 <br />September IS, 2003 <br />Page 1 ofO <br />Date Application Received: S-194)3 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: <br />60-Day Review Period Expires: iO 19 03 -11 - 3 <br />To:Chair Smith and Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />From: <br />Dale: <br />Subject: <br />Janice Waataja, City Planner^ <br />September 12,2003 <br />03-2943, Robert & Janet Labalt, 3202 North Shore Drive <br />- Setback, Hardcover, and Structural Coverage Variances <br />• Public Hearing <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />Lot Width: <br />LR - IB, One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1-acre min.) <br />0.223 acres (9,715 s.f.) <br />62.37 feet <br />Application Summary: Applicant requests the follouirg variance to construct an <br />addition, approximately SIS s.f. to the existing home. <br />1. Hardcover variance for the 75-250' zone to allow 3“.6® e hardcover when 25% is <br />normally allowed and 50.5% currently exists. <br />2. Hardcover variance ior the 250-500' zone to allow -2.7? o hardcover when 30% is <br />normallv allowed and 55% currentlv exists. <br />0 0 <br />3. Side yard setback variance to allow a setback of 2.S reel when 10' is required and 2.8’ <br />currently exists. <br />4. Structural coverage variance to allow 19.4% when 15% is required. <br />Sta/f Recommendation: Staff recommendations: <br />1. Denial of the proposal due to the increases in strucr.in)l coverage beyond what is <br />allowed by Ordinance. No unique hardship has been presented which would justify <br />expanding the current home’s footprint, given altemati .es for an addition exist. <br />Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections <br />Section 10.22, Subdivision 2: Lakeshore Hardcovei and Land Alteration Regulations. <br />Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(L): Hardcover Limitaiiens. <br />Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B): Lot Standards <br />Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C): Lot Coverage <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B - Survey <br />C - Revised Survey Showing Removals <br />D - Hardcover Calculations (revised by staff) <br />E - Building Plans & Elevations
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.