Laserfiche WebLink
A«g«tt 18,2003 <br />Pag* I of3 <br />trict (2 acre minimum) <br />oval for a 2-lot <br />10 North Shore Drive. <br />te following conditions: <br />ssuance of building <br />Requirements. <br />observed: <br />Yard <br />cent to Rear <br />I Yard <br />*t 50 feet <br />^lemorandum <br />sList <br />M3-2937 <br />August 18,2003 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Introduction <br />Bob Morlock is requesting preliminary plat approval for a two lot subdivision of his <br />property located at 980 North Shore Drive (Co. Rd. 19) just north of Tonkaview Lane. <br />The property is zoned RR-IB, One Family Rural Residential District which requires 2 <br />acre minimum lot sizes. The property is a 4 acre parcel to be divided into 2, 2 acre lots. <br />The existing home on the property will be removed (note that as proposed, the existing <br />house would be too close to the side lot line). The proposed legal descriptions for the <br />non-lakeshore lots are as follows: <br />Lot 1, Block I, England Third Addition <br />Lot 2, Block 1, England Third Addition <br />Both lots consist of 2 acres of dry contiguous land. The property is not located within <br />1,000’ of lakeshore and is therefore not subject to hardcover requirements. <br />Preliminaiy Plat Analysis <br />The property meets all of th ? following minimum lot size and setback requirements: <br />RR-IB Required Existing Proposed <br />Lot 1 <br />Proposed <br />Lot 2 <br />Lot Area 2 acres 4 acres 2 acres 2 acres <br />Lot Width 200’476.25 ’238 ’238.25 ’ <br />Front Yard <br />Setback 50’194*247 ’153 ’ <br />Side Yard <br />Setback (north)30’260 ’36 ’125 ’ <br />Side Yard <br />Setback (south)30’ <br />146 ’ (house) <br />17’(shed) <br />44.4 ’(shed) <br />160’72 ’ <br />Rear Yard <br />Setback 50’ <br />69.5 ’ (house) <br />10.3’(shed) <br />45.2 ’(shed) <br />174’80 ’ <br />All proposed setbacks are taken from proposed 40’ x 40’ house pads as shown on the <br />preliminarv plat. The proposed lots have enough buildable area to accommodate a house <br />much larger than the proposed 40’ x 40’ pads. <br />Access: ITte property abuts County Road 19. Hennepin County has jurisdiction over <br />access and has reviewed the preliminary plat and their comments w ill be forwarded the <br />night of Plarming Commission consideration. The applicant has indicated that the <br />existing drive access will be utilized for Lot 2 and that a new drive access from Co. Rd. <br />19 will be established for Lot 1. The City Engineer has recommended a shared driveway <br />agreement to minimize curb cuts on Co. Rd. 19. The issue of a private drive or additional <br />Co. Rd. 19 access should be discussed. Planning Department staff would recommend that