Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, June 16,2003 <br />6;00 o’clock p.m. <br />(#4 #03-2905 HEIDI B. NAGEL, Continued) <br />There were no public comments. <br />While the total lot area indicales the Nagel's have 23,210 s.f„ Ms. Nagel pointed out that, in <br />whi th% cl'Su'S S <br />gSSSSBSSSS- <br />Nagel asked if they could back the garage up 1 1/2’ to alleviate the street setback variance. <br />^ hardcover variance requirements were different. She <br />stated that Ae applicants would need to hold to the 15% structural coverage limitation; however, <br />by sliding back the garage the hardcover variance request would be eliminated. <br />left!^r proposed bump-out would be acceptable if the garage addition was <br />Zugschwert, Rahn, and Bremer aU concurifd with staffs recommendation. <br />m^filatbM recommendations with a few more <br />Mabusth indicated that she could support approving all but the garage addition. <br />Since It would be staffs recommendation to get back to the 1999 approvals, Gaffron indicated <br />Aat blacktop would need to be removed and, since 1% is equal to 232 s.f, virtually, the enUre <br />garage addition would need to be wiped out. ^ <br />Na^l ayecd ^JaWe the application in order to work with staff on specific goals of the plan. She <br />asked whether the Commission or Siaff felt the wetland survey should be pursued. <br />Gaffron could not comment whether the City Council or Commission would wish to use wetland <br />or sepstfated land as part of lot ^ea calculations. Since the entire code would need to be <br />reconsidered, which staff would not support, he didn’t believe it was worth pursuing. <br />P«ge 8 of 22 <br />mm <br />1J