Laserfiche WebLink
1-2938 <br />MISSION ACTION <br />nnber16,2003 <br />I’ X 28' addition to the <br />.4’ where 30’ is <br />back exists and SO’ is <br />7:00 pm <br />ninutes, they are <br />l^lanning Commission. <br />i.249.4627. <br />Dale AppUcalion Received: 08>06-03 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: 08> <br />60>Day Review Period Expires: 10*2^03 <br />To: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Chair Smith and Planning <br />Ron Moorse, City Admini <br />Melanie Foth, City Planne <br />September 9,2003 <br />Subject: 03-2938, Kent & Sandra L <br />- Variance <br />- public hearing <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />RR-IB, Single Fai <br />0.584 acre (25.432 <br />Application Summary: Applicants requt <br />to construct a 10' x 28' addition to the nc <br />addition would not encroach further into <br />however would make a conforming side <br />Staff Recommendation: Planning Depai <br />1. Approval of the street setback var <br />2. Denial of the side yard setback va <br />Hardship: Staff finds that a hardship exi <br />yard due to platted right of way which sp <br />find a hardship to support the side yard e <br />conforming setback non-conforming. <br />Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections <br />10.28.5(B) Yard Requirement: Minimi <br />rear yard street setback is required. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A. Application <br />B. Hardship Statement & Photos from tl <br />C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plai <br />D. Proposed Plans and Elevations <br />E. Property Owners List <br />F. Plat Map <br />Background <br />The property is split down the middle by <br />necessity for a rear yard setback in the ce <br />right-of-way approximately 20' north of <br />WBil <br />injii rp <br />mire <br />' ^«K«.rrtva-n> «