My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-08-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
09-08-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2023 2:55:39 PM
Creation date
2/8/2023 2:53:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
183
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#03-2919 <br />August 12,2003 <br />Page 3 <br />The visual impacts of the combined structure are potentially significant due to the proposed <br />attachment to the existing garage via a 15'x 11 ’ greenhouse structure. The at attachment will be offset <br />5' from either end of the garages, so its visual impact will potentially be reduced by breaking up the <br />length of what would otherwise be 70* long rear southwest-facing facade, which will be visible to <br />anyone entering Orono on Highway 12. The City has a 10' building-to-building separation <br />requirement not only to address fire safety issues but to aid in the goal of limiting visual density and <br />building massing. <br />Staff finds that the need for a second building for storage is not unreasonable, and the potential <br />locations for such structure are limited because this is a wooded comer lot with hills and wetlands <br />to contend with. The hvo accessory buildings plus the greenhouse structure attaching them will total <br />2009 s.f The property is allowed up to 2000 s.f. of accessory structures in total, but no individual <br />accessory structure over 1000 s.f Connecting them with the proposed greenhouse structure would <br />not strictly be in keeping with the intent of the OAS ordinance, and would potentially have the <br />negati'. a impacts that the ordinance intends to avoid. <br />Pool Setback Variance. The proposed pool in either of the ^vo configurations provided is about 900 <br />s.f. of surface area, requiring a minimum setback of 15' from a side or rear lot line, but required to <br />meet a 50' setback from a side street lot line and 10* from other buildings. The pool will be in- <br />ground, which will have limited visual impacts that could be reduced by privacy fencing or <br />vegetative screening depending on how much of a pool surround is proposed within the 1 O' requested <br />setback area. It should also be noted that the neighborhood noise impacts associated with the pool <br />are minimal at this location far from any neighbors. It is unknown how MnDOT may use the <br />adjoining right-of-way during the Highway 12 construction over the next 4 years, but that may <br />impact how close applicants want to be to the right-of-way. Staff feels a minimum of 15' setback <br />should be required for the pool. <br />CUP for Plumbing in Accessory Structure. The proposed garage will include a toilet'sink/shower, <br />and therefore requires a conditional use permit. Planning Commission should ascertain that the <br />apparent multi-purpose functions of this building do not include use as a guest house. If that is the <br />case, approval for a CUP for plumbing in an accessory structure would be appropriate if these <br />findings can be made: <br />1 . That the proposed use of the accessory stnicture with plumbing will not be detrimental to the <br />residential character of the neighborhood. <br />2.That the plumbing fixtures proposed are in keeping with the intended use of the accessory <br />building. <br />3. <br />4. <br />The property is 2.9 acres in area or larger (it is not; it less than 2 acres in area). <br />% • <br />The accessory building is conforming in location, size and height (it won’t be - variances are <br />requested).• i <br />k \ <br />. -r
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.