Laserfiche WebLink
#03-2919 <br />July 17,2003 <br />Page 2 <br />2. <br />accessory slructuresln^^^^^^ setback is 50 ’ for principal and <br />Background <br />s.f detached garage. The nw gar!l^e tnfbe V ’ southeasterly from their existing 848 <br />IS by definition a side street lot line It abut« a lot line whichoiicci loi jine. Jt abuts the • i.. ^----- which <br />. 3ouIcvard. WhilelhepoitionofWawaiaB^ ^"*^''®'^'*'”^Highway 12 or has not been used for road pu^oses sincrral,® “ <br />.■*h..f-wayand ntusl^he <br />Side Street 5^etback Vf The request f <br />is somewhat supported by the fact that the side^r^f^" 27' to allow a 23' setback <br />vegetation. The building to be ~eV.wC with^^^^^^^^ ~ <br />due to topography, wetlands, the location of existinr^il ? * “PPlicsnts note that <br />tr^ment mound, the proposed location is the only ^ea wheTr'”'"'*' ''"'age <br />'« uccommodate their storage <br />The visual impacts of the combined stmci <br />allactaent to the existing garage, resulting in a signiHcant due to the proposed <br />s^niroi''" ' •“ Highway 12 Se r>'I "W'l'separation requirement not only to address fire safeio^.. ^ ’’“'•'i‘”g-lo-buildine <br />density and building massing. ^ in the goal of limiting visual <br />Staff finds that the need for a seconH k.mM- r <br />locations for such structure are limited becaisf thTs ifl wo H T '"d the potential <br />to contend with. The rtvo accessoiy buildings tota M4 7 <br />of acccssoiy structures in total, but no individual arc.. ^^'P™P'"y « allowed up to 2000 s f <br />wnl.^U.a(87,0,,27,g,eeid.ouse-7;ie1t^^^^^^^^^ <br />ASordmance.andwouldpotentiallyhavethenegativeimpac‘::!’hTth7:X^^^^^^^^^ <br />#03-2919 <br />July 17,2003