Laserfiche WebLink
T <br />#03-2919 <br />August 12,2003 <br />Page 2 <br />Pertinent Code Sections <br />1. 10.03 Subd. 9(C)(2) <br />2. Oversized Accessory Structures are regulated by the following table: <br />Maiimum Allowed <br />Maiimum Individual Total of All Accessory <br />Lot Area Accessory Structure Structure Footprint Areas* <br />0-1.99 acre <br />2.00- 3.00 acre <br />3.01- 3.50 acre <br />etc. <br />Footprint Area <br />1,000 s.f. <br />1,200 s.f. <br />1,400 s.f. <br />etc. <br />on a Property <br />2,000 s.f. <br />2,400 s.f. <br />2,800 s.f. <br />etc. <br />• Excluding non-roofed tennis courts, pools, paddocks, arenas <br />2.Section 10.28, Subd 5(B); Side yard adjacent to street setback is 50* for principal and <br />accessoiy structures in RR-1 B zone. pnncipai ana <br />3. <br />4. <br />Section 10.03 Subd, 9F - Plumbing in Accessory Buildings <br />Section 10.20 Subd. 3Q - CUP for Plumbing in Accessory Building. <br />Background <br />Applicant propose to wnslrucl a 996 s.f. dclached garage 1 1' soulhcaslerly from choir existing 848 <br />S.f. detached garage. The new garage will be located 93 i j.. .f, hvTr V 23.1 feet from the south side lot line 4ich <br />IS by defimtion a side street lot line. It abuts the dedicated right-of-wav of old Hiohvi ^v 19 <br />Wayaala BouIevard_ WTiilc the portion of Wayzata Boulevard immediately adjacent toihe property <br />!9Ws, it is still <br />Me Street Setback Variance. The request for a variance of approximately 27’ to allow a 23* setback <br />IS somewhat supported by the fact that the side street is no longer in use ^d has reverted to^amrai <br />vegetation. The building to be constructed is one sloo’ with gabled roof. The applicants note that <br />ue o opography, wetlands, the location of existing site improvements, and the existing sewage <br />treatment mound, the proposed location is the only area where they car^ a^comiaSefr storageneeds. <br />i^:e^i;e AW8S9IY S^Hure Vprinneg. The Council adopted the Oversize Accessory Structure <br />™ “ 'h' of individual accessotyTuiS^ «well as on the total square footage of accessoty buildings ^tilh^ o„^^^ <br />mailer than 2 acres, it was concluded that no oversize accessoty structures should be allowed <br />md any structure over 1000 s.f would be considered as oversized. The concern <br />bulk of structures on properties, with »intent to limit the visual density «uj r«ain o^^e