Laserfiche WebLink
4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />Approval of the hardcover variances per the revised plans is reasonable, <br />finding that the plan reflects what appears to be the minimum hardcover <br />necessary to support a reasonable residence on the property, as follows: <br />Hardcover in the 0-75' zone will be reduced from 1058 s.f (29.4%) <br />to 535.3 s.f. (14.8%) where no hardcover is allowed, by reducing deck <br />steps and concrete slab areas. <br />Hardcover in the 75-250’ zone will be reduced from 2257.1 s.f. <br />(51.9%) to 1961.38 s.f. (45.1%) where 25% is allowed. <br />Applicant should provide a suitable drainage ,ylan be developed prior to final <br />Council action, to address the drainage concerns expressed by ncigliboring <br />property owners. <br />The City Council reviewed this application on July 28,2003 meeting and on a vote <br />of 4-0 granted partial approval per the Planning Commission recommendation, <br />directing the applicant to return with a plan meeting the established parameters and <br />directing stall to draft a resolution for adoption. <br />The City Council reviewed the submitted revisions on August 11,2003 and tabled <br />the application for further revisions to eliminate excessive encroachment of the 10' <br />side setbacks by garage roof overhangs. On August 25,2003 the Council reviewed <br />the further revised proposal and finds it to meet the parameters established for <br />development of this substandard site. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by <br />the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, <br />safety and welfare of the community. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it <br />and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the <br />variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire <br />hazard or other danger to neighboring property, would not merely serve as a <br />convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship <br />or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and <br />would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and <br />Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />Page 3 of 7