Laserfiche WebLink
M3-3MI <br />AttgNstIl.2003 <br />Page 5 of5 <br />The proposal is not contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. The property <br />will exist in the manner that it exists today. <br />12. “The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the <br />applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty." <br />The granting of the variance will alleviate hardships inherent to the property. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Should the garage be moved to a location that meets ordinance even thought that <br />location isn’t the most feasible and would change the character of the lot? <br />2. Does the shifting of the garage two feet to the south create any problems? <br />3. Arc there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Approval of the front yard setback variance to allow a front yard setback of 28.2 ’ when <br />35’ is normally required due to the topographical and setback constraints inherent to the <br />property. <br />»•, <br />A.*.’ <br />* s