My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-25-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
08-25-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 8:44:20 AM
Creation date
2/8/2023 2:44:57 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
419
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#02-2930 <br />August 14, 2003 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />5."Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct <br />sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered <br />construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1 16J.06, Subd. 2, when in <br />harmony with this Chapter." <br />N/A <br />6.“The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance <br />any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for property in the zone where the <br />affected person's land is located." <br />N/A <br />7. “The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family <br />dwelling as a two-family dwelling." <br />N/A <br />8."The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to <br />such property or immediately adjoining property." <br />In the opinion of staff this criterion is not met. <br />9.“The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in <br />which said land is located." <br />In the opinion of staff this criterion is not met. <br />lO. “The granting of the application is necessary for the preser\'ation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant" <br />In the opinion of staff this criterion is not met. <br />11 . “The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, <br />comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrar>' to the intent of the Zoning Code.' <br />In the opinion of staff this criterion is met. <br />12. “The granting of such variance w ill not merely serve as a convenience to the <br />applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty." <br />In the opinion of staff this criterion is not met. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1 . Does the Planning Commission find that the existing non-conforming fence within <br />the 0-75’ zone be removed? <br />2. Docs the Planning Commission agree that the property should be restored to the <br />levels previously approved in 1995? <br />3. Are tliere any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />% .
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.