My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-11-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
08-11-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 8:43:48 AM
Creation date
2/8/2023 2:36:04 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 28,2003 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />There were none. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />*3. #02-2809 RICK STERLING, 1300 VINE PLACE - VARIANCE AMENDMENT <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5008 <br />Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5008, a Resolution <br />granting an average lakeshore setback variance for 1300 Vine Place. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0, <br />4. #03-2895 GARY GERMUNDSEN, 4101 HIGHWOOD ROAD - VARIANCE <br />Waataja reported that the applicant had requested the following variances to construct a <br />I2’XI2* deck on the lakeside of the new residence. 50.5% hardcover in the 75-250’ zone <br />(46.8% currently exists) where 25% is allowed and 1,708 s.f. of structural coverage (1,528 <br />currently exists) where 1,500 s.f. is allowed. <br />Waataja stated that staff would recommend denial of the request based on Resolution <br />#4645 which approved variances allowing construction of the existing house, limiting the <br />applicant to 40% hardcover. Furthermore, denial of the request would be recommended <br />since, as it currently exists, the home is over on lot coverage by structures and never <br />received a variance. The Planning Commission concurred with staff and voted 7-0 to <br />recommend denial of the hardcover and structural coverage variances finding no viable <br />hardships to support the variance requests. <br />In addition, when reviewing hardcover calculations, Waataja pointed out that retaining <br />walls were added at the time of construction to ensure proper drainage and were not <br />proposed with the initial renewal variance review process. The driveway also appears <br />larger than what was depicted on the original survey. <br />Currently, the home is in excess of the Lot coverage by structures by 28 s.f., at 1,528 s.f. <br />This was a result of a modification to the plan upon construction of the home. Waataja <br />stated that the modifications include the 1.5 ’XI2’ two story bump-out and enlarged deck <br />entry. The applicant is proposing a second story deck and stairw ay off the lakeside of the <br />home greater than 6 ’ off grade; therefore, it would be included in the lot coverage by <br />structures figure. <br />Germundsen stated that he bought the home with the structure and plans done. He noted <br />that the plans did not accommodate well for water runoff, since most of the water from <br />Highwood Road runs between he and his neighbor’s property. He indicated that he had <br />nothing on the property to trade for the deck and believed that the deck would provide him <br />with an additional fire safety access. Germundsen maintained that the small lot was zoned <br />too large for what it could accommodate and shared letters from both his neighbors in <br />PAGE 3 of 18 <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.