My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-11-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
08-11-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 8:43:48 AM
Creation date
2/8/2023 2:36:04 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
L.„. <br />#03«2901 4 12S Htghwood Road <br />May 15.2003 <br />Page 2 <br />2.Section 10.22 Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(L): <br />Hardcover limitations: Allowed Existing Proposed <br />0-75 ’ 0% 6.5 %* 6.5% <br />75-250 ’ 25% 37.1%* 37.71% <br />• After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds <br />3.Section 10.56 Subdivision 16(C)(6), variance to permit an 8' encroachment of the average <br />lakeshore setback <br />4. Section 10.03, Subd. 9(A), variance to allow an accessory structure (existing detached <br />garage) without a principal structure during the construction period. <br />Existing Conditions <br />The lot currently contains an existing residence structure which the owner wishes to replace, and a <br />detached garage which is proposed to remain. <br />Pluff lippact The site has steep slopes, and although a formal bluff analysis has not been <br />completed, the easterly 2/3 of the 0-75* zone appears to meet the criteria for a bluff, having an <br />average slope of32-34% from the shoreline to the 956'-958' contour, above which the slope reduces <br />to no more than 18%. Both the existing house and proposed house are outside of the bluff impact <br />zone as defined by the 956-958’ contours moving east to west, and just meet the top-of-bluff30' <br />setback requirement. However, the existing deck which is proposed to either remain in place or be <br />reconstructed, is within 1-2 ’ of the top of bluff at its southeast comer. <br />Existing, Q-75 —Zone /^^enitie$. Existing retaining walls, concrete or flagstone walkways and <br />stairways in the 0-75 ’ zone are in good condition and no changes are proposed. The 0-75 ’ zone also <br />contains m 8'xl2’ shed and an area of landscape timbers surrounding planting beds near the shore. <br />The existing 0-75 ’ landscaping has been developed for many years and is a unique feature of this <br />property that applicant would prefer to not disturb. There also is a stone lined pond area east of the <br />house in the 0-75 ’ zone which is underlaid with landscape fabric. This area is not proposed to be <br />changed but the fabric liner must be removed according to City requirements (Resolution No. 4006). <br />Dri vg^yay$ ^nd Site Acpe$s. Another unique characteristic of the property is the driveway access, <br />which is a circuitous route from Highwood Road to the detached garage, and includes a large paved <br />area for parking and maneuvering, plus retaining walls that accomplish the necessary grade change. <br />While this area could likely be totally reworked to result in a more efficient access and reduced <br />hardcover, applicant again notes that this would change the entire character of the property. Minor <br />revisions to the paved areas are proposed in an attempt to reduce hardcover in the 75-250 ’ zone.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.