My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-11-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
08-11-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 8:43:48 AM
Creation date
2/8/2023 2:36:04 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, May 19,2003 <br />6:00 o ’clock p.in. <br />(#7 ^03-2893 JOHN AND ROBERTA HENRICH, Continued) <br />minimum lot size of one acre and a lot width of 140’ measured at the lakeshore and at the <br />75' setback. They were requesting variances to permit new construction on an undersized <br />lot (0.66 acre) having a conforming lot width of 150’-157’. An average lakeshore setback <br />variance is requested for an encroachment of approximately 8’ by the proposed house. The <br />existing detached garage will remain, requiring a variance to allow an accessory structure <br />without a principal structure during the construction period. Also requested is a hardcover <br />variance for the 75-250’ zone to allow 37.71% where only 25% is normally allowed. <br />Gaffron noted that the site plan centers the new house within the 75-250’ zone meeting all <br />required lot line setbacks but encroaching slightly past the average setback. The new house <br />would encroach only 2-3’ further past the average setback line than the existing house, and <br />would have insignificant impact on neighboring views of the lake. The house location <br />approximately 107* from the lakeshore meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for new <br />structures. Gaffron continued that the existing detached garage is less than 20 years old and <br />is in good condition. It contains a storage area below which fits well with the topography <br />of the site. <br />Once again, Gaffron stated that the primary concern is the harucover variance request. The <br />Plaiuiing Commission and Council have been fairly consistent in denying hardcover <br />variances for new construction unless a distinct hardship can be demonstrated. He pointed <br />out that structural coverage is proposed at approximately 2370 s.f. or 8.3 %, well within <br />the 15 % limitation. <br />With regard to bluff impacts, Gaffron reported that if the existing deck remains in place, it <br />has a legal nonconforming status in regard to the bluff setback, as it was constructed in <br />1990, prior to the 1992 adoption of bluff ordinances as part of the Shoreland ordinance. If <br />it is replaced, it will require a variance to the required 30’ top-of-bluff setback requirement <br />for structures. <br />Gaffron explained that the proposed hardcover in the 75-250’ zone is 6,280 s.f or 37.71 %. <br />The applicant has included in his letter of request a number of factors which he believes <br />are hardships that support the variance request. These factors include the ability to park <br />numerous vehicles off of Highwood Road which is very narrow and has only minimal <br />ability for on-strect parking. A hardcover variance was granted for the site in 1990 <br />resulting in a reduction from 43.6% to 43.0% in the 75-250’ zone. <br />Whereas the house footprint is increasing in size from about 1240 s.f to 1600 s.f and the <br />new house is not excessive for the lot, the ancillary hardcover is the primary issue for <br />discussion. Gaffron maintained that it is staff s opinion that a site plan could be developed <br />that would accommodp'.e the proposed new home on this property without the need for a <br />hardco\'er variance. However, that would require substantial changes to the character of <br />the lot, and would potentially result in less off-street parking availability. <br />PAGE 24 of 39
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.