My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-28-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
07-28-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2023 4:26:23 PM
Creation date
2/8/2023 1:56:02 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
511
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#03-2904 <br />July 17,2003 <br />Page 3 <br />Hardship Analysis <br />StafThas not revised the hardship analysis (see June memo). Planning Commission must determine <br />whether the proposed removals and resultant reduced hardcover are supported by unique <br />circumstances or hardships. <br />( <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. The applicant proposes a revised plan such that the hardcover will be reduced to a level of <br />2,167 s.f. less than the existing but still exceeding that allowed by City Codes by 908 s.f. <br />2. The applicant ’s acquisition of the property was finalized before he knew the magnitude of <br />the hardcover excesses. <br />3. Retaining walls that encroach past the lot line or are less than 26' from wetlands should be <br />relocated to be within the property and meet wetland setbacks. While the City has minimal <br />use of the adjacent right-of-ways and they appear to a casual observer as part of this property, <br />the City has no intent to vacate those right-of-ways, hence applicant cannot make the property <br />larger to reduce the hardcover percentage. <br />4. Does Planning Commission have any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff Recommeodation <br />Staff makes the following recommendations: <br />1 . If Planning Commission determines that the unique circumstances regarding the history of <br />this property can be deemed as a hardship, then a recommendation for approval of the after- <br />the-fact variances per the revised removal plan would be in order. <br />2. Existing encroachments of wetland or required wetland setbacks by retaining walls, fill or <br />paved surfaces should be removed. <br />3. Retaining walls should be removed wherever they extend outside the property boundaries, <br />and any walls to remain within 5' of the lot lines should be reviewed by staff to determine <br />whether they are needed to support steep slopes or whether they are purely aesthetic in nature, <br />and those not necessary to support the topography of the site should be removed. <br />4. All landscape bed lined with fabric or plastic shall have such liner removed.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.