My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-28-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
07-28-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2023 4:26:23 PM
Creation date
2/8/2023 1:56:02 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
511
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />\ <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, July 21,2003 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />While the existing roof cave encroaches 3.5ā into the 10' side yard setback, only I.Sā of the <br />eave is considered a non-encroachment. Applicant wishes to keep the existing eave. <br />Udell maintained that' they would confine the construction to building on top of existing <br />%structure. <br />Rahn questioned where overhangs exist elsewhere on the home and whether the eye row <br />would be flat or raised. \ <br />GafTron pointed out that the ^ ^verhang runs the entire length of the oth^'Side of the <br />home. <br />d\.Chair Smith asked if the work could begone without the excess eave. <br />Tia Udell stated that they needed the eave^ reduce water and drainage problems. <br />Mr. Lucas stated that, aesthetically, the applic)mt would wish to keep the existing overhang <br />which matches the overhangs across the entire Iwme. <br />Mr. Udell stated that the inset eyebrow and inset gutter would assist them in <br />eliminating the flat rubber roof and water probl^is tn^ face currently <br />Hawn asked if the applicants could makq/tne design w^ with no further overiiang than <br />currently exists. <br />Chair Smith questioned why staff b^ld recommended denial forthe overhang. <br />0 m <br />While, aesthetically, the overhang should be there, Gaffron stateXthat it encroaches and <br />there is no hardship to support its approval. <br />Udell maintained that without the overhang water pools at the comers ah^ they need to be <br />able to channel the water to the outside edges. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Hawn moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approval of Application #0^915, <br />Nor^rn Sunrooms, Inc.for Scott Udell, 2166 Shadywood Road, granting the aveh^e <br />lakeshore setback variance and excess roof eave encroachment. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nay <br />(1113) #03-2916 PHILLIP SMITH, 2600 WEST LAFAYETTE ROAD, VARIANCES, <br />8:45-9:11 P.M. <br />Phillip Smith, the applicant, was present.9, <br />PAGE 19 of 37 <br />B <br />#
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.