My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-28-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
07-28-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2023 4:26:23 PM
Creation date
2/8/2023 1:56:02 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
511
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Variance Application (June 2003) <br />583ParkLue <br />Stewart A Oiiui Hansen <br />HAROSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS <br />The property is a amall lot and we have worked di^eody to draft a proposal diat ftdb widiin the <br />atfM and our guidelines and goals. The proposed solution will allow us to add curb appeal by; <br />1. **Softe^g'* and reducing the oppressive feeling of being overwhelmed by the home, and- <br />2* “blend” into &e neighborho^ dirough the use of landscapiiig (undediun by <br />Furthermore, it meets the Ciqr’a guidelines of cedudng structural coverage and hardcover overall, and <br />reduces the structural coverage and hardcover, thereby reducing the runoff on die lake tide of the <br />home. <br />We are revesting two variances. The first is for a 5’ tide yard setback where 10* is nonnaUy required <br />for the covered entry. The house is currendy at 3’ and the proposed entry is 2 ’ from the edee of the <br />house, which was the maximum available in order to maintain a roof on the entry that will help t< <br />break up the current wall ^ <br />The second is for a 3’ side yard setback where 10* is normally required for the deck. This is whei <br />the deck is currendy located and is in line with the setback of the home. It wfll not protrude anv <br />further than current or than the home. ^ <br />* •! <br />Finally, since we have purchased the home, we have consisiendy reduced the hardcover (over 800 <br />square feet) widi no addidon or exchange) in the 75-250’ setback, by. <br />1. Removing dog kennels and asphalt on die east and south side (-725 square feet); <br />2. Completed remodel with no addidon or exchange ofstructural coverage or hardcover; <br />Reconfiguring landscape of keystone wall when house was remodded in 2001 (-20 square feet). <br />4. Replaced a dered railroad tie wall with a sin^e boulder wall in 2002 (-80 square feet). <br />Furthermore, there has been no addition of structural coverage. <br />We also deceased the hardcover in the 0-75’ setback by 55 square feet when the railroad tie wall was <br />replaced with a boulder wall and removing landscape underlain by plastic and replacing with mulch <br />This proposal does NOT require any changes in the 0-75’ setback sone. <br />.1 ..P <br />ra«3«r>
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.