Laserfiche WebLink
Dale Application Received: 06-16-03 <br />Dale Application Considered as Complete: 06-164)3 <br />60-Day Review Period Eipires: 0-15-03 <br />________ <br />JUL 2 8 2005 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CUYur OHONO <br />Date* July 23.2003 <br />Item No.: <br />DcpartmcDt Approval: <br />Name: Melanie Foth <br />Title: City Planner <br />Adminbtrator Approval:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #03-2913- Stewart & Gina Hansen, 583 Park Lane - Variance - Resolution <br />LR-IB, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 1-acre/140* width <br />9,500 s.f.± (0.219 acre) <br />49.65’ <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />Lot Width: <br />List of Exhibits: <br />A - Resolution per Planning Commission Recommendation <br />B - PC Action Notice 07-23-03 <br />C - PC Memo & Exhibits as of 07-21-03 <br />Application Summary: The applicants are proposing construction of a 6’ x 20’ covered <br />p^irch entry 5’ firom the side lot line where a 10’ setback is required. The applicants have <br />proposed a reduction in structural coverage amounts of 0.2%, and hardcover reductions from <br />57.1% to 54.7% (not including landscaping underlain with plastic or fabric which will be <br />removed). <br />Planning Commission has requested the applicants further reduce hardcover by removing <br />equal amounts of hardcover under portions of the existing deck to be reduced. <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />On July 21, 2003, Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the 5’ side yard <br />variance subject to the applicants making a further reduction in hardcover by matching the square <br />footage reductions approved for their lakeside deck. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends approval per the attached Resolution, which reflects Planning Commission <br />recommendation. Note that staff initially recommended that the 10’ side setback be required; <br />however. Planning Commission concluded that requiring the 10' setback was a hardship due to <br />existing window and well pit location, and the addition as proposed is not a detriment to the <br />neighborhood. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED a. <br />** <br />Adopt or amend the attached resolution. <br />I