Laserfiche WebLink
Stttaclis: <br />Lakeshore <br />Avenge Ltkeduxc <br />PropotedDtck-fiom42*wS7*. <br />Pn^MudDtck-tatmtfaimwtkdtdaiMndtjkbortmghoma <br />¥>Uek we erepnpadagt0bei*deqt bf 16*kmg, meabituubd <br />Sinictural Coverage: <br />Total Stnietunl Coverage Weanpnpareito pnpim a ISOObJ. ttmettni eo mage. <br />Hardcover Calcvlallona: <br />0-75’ <br />75 - 250’ <br />Propaaei kerdeowr efM6 %f.(22.4%i to beetdecedie 640 m/. <br />(l7*4)vrm4O%redHdioiiofarea0fpmi0iu4edgn. <br />in one of omr revised dafgiu we arepn^osbigndMetkmitfAe <br />hardcover bp B4s.f. ^ee attached revbed design drawings^ <br />Total lot banburfiKe pioposed in one revised design » 2435 §.€ « 30% of eatire lot. <br />Toul tot hardsatfaee as a percentage of 7S - 250' zone » 2435/4346 ” 565L <br />Hardship Slatcmcal Respons e; <br />1. We purchased the propoly under the assumption dial it was 10.800 s.f or 27% larger <br />than die actual siie (s 36 attached Real r tate Description and Hennepin Cbunty tax <br />infimnatiao). HiisafrectedaIitbepieli.jinarycalculatiaiisHrez3adetcgaRlingthiagawe <br />could do to alter the existing stnicture, specifically lakeriiore s^nbadi zone (our home is <br />ill lino with hnth lijnininc prn7nTiri. ttirrrfnm aisiiminfl thii hnmr ififii in rnnfinrniinrr <br />Also regarding “cuirenttybeittg used for a reasonable use....” is a subjective streament <br />l‘or our iimuly, die current aze and quality of diis home cannot be used widdn reason. <br />Our current living sitnalion is a 2700 s.f. home where my wifio and 1 live with two <br />children The reason the previous owners moved was to have a larger home; fin oUdi <br />diey felt they could not afford to add an to this property. It was/is our intention to <br />ircpiovc the s,ipeaiance; q dity and size of this home; something we feel would be a <br />welcome idea within this nwi^borhood, not a distia don <br />2. V/e take offi-asc to the statement **1 .'*.owing full v/:!! in cdvzr.ee the limhatioas of die <br />p.-opimy”. On initial invcRigationoftfae property ibowad the property aiaa to be lO.SOO <br />s.f. which is und.r the acre reqouen' nt wi Jiin this area, but 27% larger than the actual <br />property, if dull had been the case, scv.»l of Cie variance issues and calculations would <br />have been greatly reduced in our favor. Again ufiErtod:; attached Reel Estate <br />Description and Hennqiin County ttx information. Also our irutial visual iiH|>ncrions <br />were amducted in the month of Mardi, with the shoreline and eethack vague (anow and <br />ice). We did not fed it was appropriate to have a survey oondueied on a prapany we did <br />not in*firet owtL If die lot had been the size we first thought, the 25% allowable hardcover <br />would have been 1380 s.£ instead of die current allowable ^10fi7s.f.