Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, July 2 1,2003 <br />6:00 o'clock p,m. <br />> Total hardcover as a percent of 75-250' zone will reduce from the existing 3315 s f. <br />(76.3%) to 2496 s.f. (57%). <br />Gaffron indicated that staff would recommend the following: <br />a) Denial of the 4' side setback variances for the garage, as it can be still shifted to meet a <br />10’ setback with some interior design changes. <br />b) Denial of the second story additions within the side setbacks, because they will tend to <br />overshadow adjoining properties, and lead to issues over future maintenance. <br />c) Approval of the second stoiy addition encroachment of the 75 ’ lakeshore setback. <br />d) Approval of the hardcover variances as proposed, as this the plan reflects what appears <br />to staff to be the minimum hardcover necessary to support a reasonable residence on <br />the property. <br />c) Require that a suitable drainage plan be developed prior to review by the Council. <br />At the June Planning Commission the Planning Commission tabled the request for further <br />review and analysis by staff. The applicants have made a number of revisions since the <br />June meeting, the changes needing variance approval are summarized above. Gaffron <br />explained that the characteristics of the most recent plan include: <br />- Deck removal and replacement with a small (95 s.f.) deck in 0-75 ’ zone to limit structural <br />coverage; <br />- Remov^ of extraneous hardcover in 0-75 ’ zone and 75-250 ’ zones; <br />- Relocation of the attached garage to be approximately 6’ from the left side lot line at its <br />closest point, and to avoid encroachment of the sewer easement; <br />- The second story additions directly above the existing house footprint remain, so the side <br />setback and lakeshore setback variances are still requested; <br />The driveway is minimized to a width of 10’, widening near the garage; the existing <br />detached garage by the road will be removed. <br />Gaffron continued, pointing out the primary issues with the current proposal including: <br />a) <br />c) <br />d) <br />The second story addition is partly in the 0-75 ’ zone, and adds additional bulk of <br />structure nearer the lake than nomially allowed. <br />The second story addition is proposed to continue the existing extremely <br />substandard side setbacks of 4 ’-5 ’ on the left side and 2.5-3.9’ on the right side. The <br />Building Official has determined that windows can be allowed wherever the walls <br />are 3 or more from side lot lines, which leaves only a sho. length of the south <br />side wall as ineligible for windows. <br />The attached garage is proposed to be 6’ from the side lot line, which is better than <br />the ongmal proposal but still constitutes new structure in a substandard setback. <br />Drainage is still a concern, although from staff’s perspective the most recent plan <br />will actually reduce the magnitude of overland drainage from the rear half of this <br />site. Staff believes the drainage issues are not made worse with this plan, and a <br />suitable drainage plan incorporating swales and roof gutters can be‘devised to <br />PAGE 9 of 37