My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-28-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
07-28-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2023 4:26:23 PM
Creation date
2/8/2023 1:56:02 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
511
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. <br />a) The applicant constructed I '-2' high retaining walls and a stairw'ay on the street <br />side of the road without obtaining the required building permits. Only the <br />stairway at a 4' width would likely have been granted a permit had one been <br />applied for. <br />b) The creation of a flat area above the walls for potential storage of trailers or <br />other property within 75' of the lakeshore is not necessary to preserve any <br />inherent property rights of the owner, and no suitable hardship supporting or <br />justifying the walls has been presented by the applicant. Furthermore, <br />Orono’s 2000-2020 Community Management Plan (CMP) Part 3A, the <br />Environmental Protection Plan, in Urban Area Policies for Natural Resource <br />Management, Policy 2, states that “Retainf'^g walls will be discouraged <br />except when absolutely necessary to prevent erosion, in which case they will <br />be screened with natural vegetation." <br />c) The retaining walls are constructed on a slope of 1:6 or 17% over a distance <br />ofl 0-1 S', and Planning Commission concludes that the walls are not necessary <br />to prcser\ e the slope. <br />d) The Planning Commission findsthattheslopeofapplicant’syardonthehouse <br />side of the street has a steep bank near the street lot line which does ^pear <br />require stabilization to prevent erosion, and a retaining wall at that location <br />would be appropriate and would be supported by hardship to the land, subject <br />to adequate screening to minimize the visual impacts of tliat wall, and subject <br />to construction of the wall outside the right-of-way of Fagemess Point Road. <br />e) Applicant should be required to restore the grade on the lake side of the road <br />and revegetate that area. Applicant should obtain a building permit for the <br />maximum 4' wide stainvay that would be allowed on the lake side of the road. <br />Applicant must provide adequate plans and obtain the appropriate building <br />permits for construction of the stairs, as well as for the w'alls on the house side <br />of the road.. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by <br />the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, <br />safety and welfare of the community. <br />Page 2 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.