My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-23-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
06-23-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2023 4:25:31 PM
Creation date
2/8/2023 1:43:04 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
424
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
«01-2714 • 1340 Baldur Park Rd. <br />March 19,2003 ' <br />Pages <br />available, the issue remains as to whether the sewer construction would be a private project <br />involving both Franklin and Puzak, or whether it would be completed and assessed as a public <br />project. <br />Another alternative would be to allow construction of the 5-bedroom home connected to the 3- <br />bedroom septic system, and require that the house be connected to sewer as soon as it becomes <br />available. The obvious risk is that this or a subsequent owner might overuse the system and cause <br />it to fail. <br />The variances granted on November 13,2001 expired on November 13,2002 because no permit was <br />applied for nor obtained before the expiration date. The City notified iqiplicant twice in writing of <br />the expiration date and the need to sign the resolution copies to validate them before building permits <br />could be issued. Applicant never signed the resoluri«»^& From staffs perspective, despite <br />applicant’s ongoing discussions with Paul Weinberger, die variances have technically expired and <br />a new application must be processed. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Provide direction to applicant and staff regarding die following: <br />1. Should applicant be allowed to construct a new home without connection to municipal <br />sewer? <br />2. If so, should the house be reduced in size from 5-bedrooms to 3-bedrooms to match the <br />design capacity of the septic system? <br />3. Is there any basis to allow variance renewal without going through the formal review
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.