My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
06-09-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2023 4:13:58 PM
Creation date
2/8/2023 1:26:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
451
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
c <br />6^4 <br />Ed & Greda Toth Variance Application 3/18/02 <br />DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST <br />Describe request in detail: <br />Estimated Construction Cost; $875,000 <br />We are an '"empty nest” retired couple. We would like to build a lakeside home to live in which <br />is sufficient size for our children and grandchildren to visit us in comfort We have lived in <br />Orono for 13 years and love it here. Our request is that we can build a house, as it is described in <br />this Variance application <br />Additional Background Information <br />We have a purchase agreement to buy the properties at 1280 and 1290 Spruce, contingent <br />upon this Variance application approval, from the Killians who will be our new neighbors. <br />We are extremely sensitive to the delicate lakefront ecology and have worked closely with the <br />Killians and our designers to come up with a plan that will significantly improve the beauty <br />and lakefront en vironment of these adjacent parcels. <br />In a nutshell, the net impact of our two proposals (Toths ’ and Killians ’) is to remove about <br />3,000 square feet of hardcover from the 0’-75’ lake front zone. 3,000 square feet is the <br />equivalent of one good sized or two extremely modest homes. The only man made items left <br />in that zone are essential existing retaining walls needed for erosion control, and existing <br />stairs so that we can walk to the edge of the water. Additionally, the net effect of our two <br />proposals will be to reduce the overall site hardcover from 42% to 39% while removing a <br />significant portion of hardcover which is presently in the 0’-75 zone and placing a reduced <br />amount well within present day set backs. <br />We have met several times with Orono planning officials and have continued to reduce the <br />size of our proposed home until it has reached what we consider a functional minimum. <br />Hardship/Description of Unusual Property Conditions Response <br />First, we would love to continue to live u: Orono. It has been our home for 13 years and we <br />wish to remain among our friends and neighbors. We also love our garden. My wife’s gardening <br />has been featured multiple years in the annual garden tour. <br />Now, regarding our new home. It is our understanding that these lots were subdivided at a time <br />when the city’s lot requirements were much smaller. Subsequently, the area has been re-zoned <br />with much higher minimum lot size requirements. This re-zoning has created a hardship by <br />making historically buildable lots unbuildable. We therefore request that the city grants us a <br />variance regarding minimum lot size and maximum allowable hardcover for these lots. <br />Because tw o separate sewer hook ups have approved and maintained for many years, the lots <br />could be developed separately and two homes could be built, one on each lot. (See Diagram of <br />Proposal #1, Sheet #3 of attached supporting documents.) <br />as ^ <br />.v" t t M > y t-' ^ii L <br />j
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.