My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
06-09-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2023 4:13:58 PM
Creation date
2/8/2023 1:26:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
451
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, May 19,2003 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />Mr. DeVeau stated that they had outgrown the home years ago, and contemplated <br />remodeling; however, they decided to build a new home since the costs would be similar. <br />Mary Torkelson, 670 Tonkawa Road, voiced she and her husband’s support for the new <br />home. She felt the proposed residence would be a good addition to the neighborhood. She <br />noted that the new home built next door to the DeVeau’s current residence severely <br />impacted the DeVeau’s views of the lake. <br />Bieker pointed out that the retaining walls could not be removed and serve a real purpose. <br />Based on the fact that the lot was undersized. Chair Smith stated that she did not have <br />much problem with the application. She asked the applicants to provide the City Engineer <br />with the appropriate drainage information. She encouraged the applicants to squeeze the <br />hardcover down closer to 25%. <br />Hawn asked whether they could move the excess hardcover out of the 250’ setback zone. <br />GalTron indicated that pulling the structure back 15’ would not help reduce the hardcover <br />by any significant amount and would adversely affect the home’s views. He stated that <br />even if the pulled the home back to gain 150 s.f. and turned the garage to be end loading, <br />which would gain 200 s.f., they would not be much closer to 25% hardcover. <br />Mabusth indicated that the hardcover for these narrow lots would explain why most of the <br />hordes have detached garages at the top of their properties along this stretch. <br />While they could probably build a detached garage, Gaffron stated that they would have a <br />considerably long walk to the house. He maintained that the applicants could lose little in <br />the 0-75 setback, since the retaining walls, steps, and landings were necessary'. <br />Chair Smith noted that the Commission would be hard pressed not to get closer to 25%. <br />PAGE 48 of 37 <br />(
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.