My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-27-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
05-27-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2023 4:13:29 PM
Creation date
2/8/2023 9:15:08 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
296
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r: <br />,546939 <br />b <br />GITYofORONO <br />I RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />467 1NO. <br />A RESOLUTION DENYING <br />VARIANCES PER <br />MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br />SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 AND <br />SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) (2) <br />FILE #2636 <br />WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing <br />under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and <br />WHEREAS, pursuant to State Statutes 412 et. seq. and 462 et. seq., the City Council <br />of the City of Orono has adopted zoning regulations for the protection of the public health, safety <br />and general welfare; and <br />WHEREAS, Gary Cable and Susan Cable (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners <br />of the property located at 3532 Ivy Place within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally <br />described as follows: SCIVlOeS IHC. <br />Lots 179 and 180, Taylor ’s Subdivision of Spring Par^0t4^fWnnepin County, <br />Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and <br />WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City of Orono for a variance to <br />Municipal Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (2) to permit <br />3,346 s.f. (25.4%) hardcover on the property where the land area within the 75-250’ setback allows <br />3,250 s.f. (25%) hardcover to permit an ice house within 75* of the lakeshore to remain on the <br />property; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the application; the recommendations <br />of the City staff and the Planning Commission; and the comments and written statements submitted <br />by the applicant. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, <br />Minnesota hereby denies the requested after-the-fact variances as described above based on one or <br />more of the following findings of fact concerning this property: <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />0 ^
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.