Laserfiche WebLink
3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />The property contains an existing residence structure and detached garage, comprising <br />‘lot coverage by structures’ of 9.3 % where up to IS % is normally allowed. The <br />existing residence, garage, decks, sidewalks, driveways, and other calculable <br />hardcover on the property totals 3S4.I s.f. or 5.2 % in the 0-75* lakeshore setback <br />zone where no hardcover is normally allowed; 4,998 s.f. or 31.7% in the 75-250 ’ <br />lakeshore setback zone where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed; and 293 s.f. <br />or 5.9 % in the 250-500' zone where up to 30% hardcover is normally allowed. <br />Hardcover on the property after proposed additions and equivalent concurrent <br />removals will not change from the existing numbers and percentages in the 0-75' and <br />250-500' zones but will decrease to 4,601 s.f. or 29.1% in the 75-250 ’ zone. <br />Proposed lot coverage by structures will be approximately! 1.3 %, well below the 15% <br />maximum allowed. <br />The sqjplicants had initially requested a side setback variance to allow the construction <br />of a first story kitchen addition above an existing basement oftice room located 1 foot <br />from the side lot line where a 10' side setback is normally required. <br />The Orono Plaiming Commission reviewed this application on April 21,2003 and <br />recommended approval of the requested hardcover and average setback variances on <br />a vote of 7-0, conditioned upon rev ision of plans to remove the basement setback <br />encroachment and construct additions meeting the required 10' side setback, limiting <br />75-250' hardcover to no more than the existing level of4,998 s.f, and encroaching <br />no further into the average lakeshore setback, based on the following findings: <br />The additions when constructed per the recommended conditions will result <br />in no loss of existing views ofthe lake enjoyed by the affected property owner <br />directly to the south, due to the increased side setback from the existing <br />situation and existing topography and vegetation. <br />The proposal concurrent removals in existing hardcover will result in no net <br />increase in hardcover on the site. <br />The existing basement in the area of the proposed kitchen addition is 1 foot <br />from the side lot line where a 10' setback is required, and is not structurally <br />sufticient to support a story above it. This basement must be removed and <br />replaced in order for such addition to occur. There is no hardship justification <br />Page 2 of 6